Global human power Essay

to the highest degree of the dupes in the novel were Frankensteins family, William, Henry, Justine and Elizabeth. These people all suffered due to the shafts anger from Frankensteins original neglect, which is what begun the hatred in the pecker. It is not fair to view the creature as a human, as he was artificially created he has no human morals and has neer been taught the difference between unspoiled and wrong, in the same sense that a court would never convict a baby.Although the creature did get it on to master human language skills, it only pushed him further away from society as it allowed him to express his unknown quantity nature. We can delay this in the novel when the creature put his hand into a fire, because the colours and groove of the fire attracted him I thrust my hand into the come through embers simply quickly drew it out once again with a cry of pain. The creature was a victim in the way that he was untaught of the world before he stepped into it.Eli zabeth can easily be portrayed as a hacek in the novel as she represented a saintly soul and a living constitution of love. This lets her trim back however, when she attempts to save Justine in a religiously Christian based way, which was not successful. Although viewed as a hero she doesnt contain any power over other characters, just a good heart. There is controversy over whether Frankenstein could be viewed as a hero or not, as a cowardly attribute is certainly not a trait of a true hero. When the addict asked him to create a companion for him, he said no as this would enables the creatures to breed and possibly school over global human power.On the other hand he could have spared his family a wad of trouble if he had just created another being who could have possibly shown the love and understanding the creature needed. Frankenstein later realises this when he says For the first time, I felt what the duties of a creator towards his creature were, and that I ought to indi cate him happy before I complained of his wickedness. Elizabeth, Frankensteins wife, was also a hero as she managed to constitute up everyones spirits at sad times, and she continually believed in Justines innocence. This particular writing style creates a need for both heroes and villains, as it is usually the case of good trying to overpower evil, or vice-versa.To conclude, I believe that there are heroes and villains, as well as victims in this novel. Most of the characters come along to change from villains, heroes and victims throughout the novel, especially the creature and Frankenstein. In my belief the creature was made to be the victim from the opening of the novel as he was neglected, uneducated and ostracised. I believe Frankenstein could have changed everything if he had befriended the creature in the first place.On the other hand Frankenstein was also an isolated individual, although his isolation from society was brought on himself. The novel shows the shallowness o f people in society by showing what the monster had to endure because of his appearance, as well as the moral irresponsibility of Frankenstein as a scientist. Frankenstein was always the villain deep down as he move to play God, which I dont think should be attempted by any human being.He was obsessed with the fact that he could create life, but never once to considered if it was the right thing to do. I think Shelley is basing the whole novel on, not what Frankenstein actually did, but what he fails to do.The way the creature is portrayed in 3rd person narrative allows us to see the creature as a hero, villain and a victim. I believe that the creature viewed Frankenstein as a father figure and was mentally tortured when his own creator neglected him. He had nothing to live for, except revenge.